She keeps the receipts.
Milita is your Salesforce assurance colleague. She learns the processes your business depends on, independently proves that they work, and notices when the result changes. She isn't a chatbot that guesses, and she isn't a recorder that repeats clicks. She protects the business outcome.
Promises teams hand to Milita.
Each Promise is a business rule in your own words, the people it covers, and the results that prove it worked.
Discounts above 20% need Finance approval before a quote can be sent.
People: Dana Chen · Sales Rep. Maria Ortiz · Finance.
What proves it: a 20% quote reaches Ready to Send (state); a 25% quote enters Finance Review (state); sending is refused before approval (refusal); the same quote goes through after Maria approves it (relationship).
If it changes: "A 25% quote now goes straight to Ready to Send. It last worked Tuesday at 09:02 and first failed today at 14:18."
A sales rep never sees another region's pipeline.
People: Jordan Lee · Sales Rep, West region.
What proves it: Jordan can open West opportunities (visibility); Jordan can't open an East opportunity (refusal); Jordan's pipeline list shows only West deals (visibility).
If it changes: "Jordan can now open an East opportunity. It last worked Monday at 16:40 and first failed today at 08:15."
An urgent case from a Premier customer lands in the Escalations queue.
People: Priya Nair · Support Agent.
What proves it: the case belongs to the Escalations queue (routing); the case priority is High (value).
If it changes: "Urgent Premier cases now land in General Support. They last reached Escalations yesterday at 11:20."
Closing an opportunity as won creates exactly one order.
People: Alex Kim · Account Executive.
What proves it: exactly one order exists (count); the order references that opportunity (relationship); the order total matches the opportunity amount (value).
If it changes: "Closing a won deal now creates two orders. It last worked Thursday at 10:05 and first failed today at 09:30."
Three things carry the truth. Everything else stays out of your way.
What must remain true
A compact statement of the rule you care about: the people it covers, the environment, the boundary cases that matter, the results that prove it worked, and what it doesn't cover.
Evidence she verified it on her own
The record of a clean run she completed without help: what she did, as whom and where, the records and values, which results held, and when it happened.
What differs from the last accepted behavior
What's different from the last good Proof, when it last worked and first failed, what happened between the two proofs, and who is affected.
A Promise you've confirmed stays a draft until Milita proves it on her own. After that first clean Proof, it's a kept Promise, and she keeps checking it.
A colleague, not a test tool.
You describe the work. You don't write tests.
Say the process the way the person who does it would. She turns it into a Promise, builds the workflows, and shows you every step in a builder that looks like the Flow Builder you already know.
She asks about meaning, never mechanics.
"Does 'Submit for Finance Review' begin the approval, or only save the quote?" Never "which selector should I use?"
When one thing changes, she asks about that one thing.
If a screen changes, she asks you about only the control that moved, in the same conversation. The last proven version stays in place until the new one passes.
She reads your org before she asks for anything.
Objects, rules, flows, approvals, queues, sharing settings, installed packages. Never records, never code. Then she proposes what to protect first. Coming
She proposes what to test.
For each component she reads, a positive case and a negative case, with the persona it needs and provenance back to the rule it came from. You keep or skip each one.
She stays quiet while everything holds.
One message per fact. A colleague who reported every healthy check would train you to ignore her.
Showing Milita isn’t recording a script.
| A recorder… | Milita… |
|---|---|
| Stores a sequence of clicks | Builds a Promise about business results |
| Passes when the clicks finish | Passes only when the business results hold |
| Replays the data you used | Uses fresh test data |
| Replays one identity | Works as every person the Promise needs |
| Treats the recording as proof | Proves it again, on her own, in a clean session |
| Reports a broken step | Compares the result with the last good Proof |
| Leaves you to maintain the script | Asks you to show her only what changed |
Some things she refuses on purpose.
She won't claim something works without recent proof.
No recent run means unknown, never healthy.
She won't guess a cause.
She tells you what changed and what happened in between. She will not tell you a deployment caused it, because she cannot know that.
She won't guess which button you meant.
If she isn't sure, she asks once, and remembers your answer as an anchor that expires if the screen changes too much.
She won't count your demonstration as proof.
Only her own clean run counts.
She won't tell you the same thing twice.
One message per fact, and silence while everything holds.
She won't act on consequences alone.
A destructive, permission, credential or external action waits for you to accept it from a card. The model never executes one on its own decision.
About Milita.
Does Milita replace my testing team?
What kinds of processes can she protect?
Does she work on custom screens and managed packages?
Is Milita just an AI chatbot?
Who is behind Milita?
Tell Milita what must never break.
Start with your most important process. Free for 3 Promises, forever.